Your look at fresh movies and tasty tidbits of oldies

Welcome to Danish Fresh Cinebuns. I am your host Danish and this is a look at the movies of New and Old.



Sunday, August 7, 2011

Winnie the Pooh...As Sweet As Honey...Just Not As Sticky


Tagline: Oh Pooh
Cast: John Cleese, Jim Cummings, Bud Luckey, Craig Ferguson, Jack Boulter, Travis Oates, Kristen Anderson-Lopez, Wyatt Dean Hall, Tom Kenny.
Plot: Poohs quest for honey leads him to find Eeyore upset because he lost his tail which then leads him to find a note from Christopher Robin who was kidnapped by the BACKSON...duh duh DUHHHHHH
My Take: Winnie the Pooh once again proves why he is so damn adorable. The story was once again well thought out, but what do you expect from a Disney flick. The animation due to todays movie making advances is really well. They used to really enhance the animation not  obliterate it into something horrible. I really appreciate the fact that the kept the innocents that Winnie the Pooh is instead of revamping it for a new generation. Everything is still intact including the characters personalities, the magic of Hundred Acre Woods, and the “dawwww” wriritng that made pooh so lovable. It’s a movie that the whole family will enjoy and not just the kids now please understand it doesn’t have the same adult humor the Shrek or Toy Story throws in BUT its adorable funny and everyone will enjoy it.
                The only issue I had is that it seemed like they put two different episodes together to create a 60 minute movie. Episode 1; Helping Eeyore find a tail and Episode 2; Saving Christopher Robin from the Backson and if you do the math 30 minute episode...there are 2 of them...means an hour long. But on the other note...its great because when you take the kids, well we all know kids cant sit still for a full 90 minutes so....its in your favor.
I lied Issue #2: With the length of the movie...did Disney still have to charge full price for 2/3 a movie...way to line the pockets sir.
What I really Enjoyed: the Fact the the movie plays like a story book. Where the job from page to page and interacts with the story words on the book and the narrator.
Final Thought: Poohs nails again with the adorable quest for honey and friendship.  Its funny, cute, and all around another flick that Disney will put into the platinum super  vault lock down only to be sold when they need money...im kidding....We love you Walt.
I Give it 5 Pooh Honey Puts

Friends With Benefits...All the Friendship Double the Benefits


Cast: Justin Timberlake, Mila Kunis, Patricia Clarkson, Woody Harrelson, Jenna Elfman
Tagline: N/A
Plot: JT moves to the city to work for GQ and makes friends with Kunis...while watching movies and getting to know each other they decide they should have sex but only as friends to avoid Hollywood clichés...buuuuuuuuuuuuuuut well its Hollywood...you can figure it out.
My Take: As romantic comedies go this movie has everything that it should. Hilarious dialogue, intense sex scenes,  more hilarious dialogue, and then the conclusion. You already know what was gonna happen at the end but the journey there is what makes the movie so fantastical. When the movie starts out with a instant laughter as a JT spills coffee on his pants and has to switch with a coworker which your like ok...funny well awkward funny but then it goes one step farther when that coworker is going commando...and that sets the tone for the rest of the movie. What follows is a hilarious break up scene, and the beginning of the chemistry between JT and Mila Kunis.
                  The Chemistry the two of them can be in opinion (which is why you’re here to hear my opinion) is the same chemistry you would see on the set of friends season 9...everything flows perfectly between the two. And it solidifies JT as a comedic actor, if SNL skits didn’t do it. And Mila Kunis as  sexy well rounded actress. The sex scenes are well done and funny, even though it felt really awkward to see JTs Ass...I respect him enough not to see him naked. And I think they do a good job at ultimately answering the question the FWB do not work...feelings are always developed but if you can make it work....congratulations.
                  Now through out the movie they are doin there thing and each other while talking about Hollywood clichés, which I thought was a nice touch for this kind of movie as it was kinda poking  fun at itself..being in the romantic comedy genre.....and I always enjoy seeing a movie do that (see black dynamite review). But as you all know being in a romantic comedy it also has to follow the formula that it has been set forth by numerous others before it. What makes it work so well is the fact that it poke fun at the actions that they doing...I wont ruin the ending but you will see what I mean.
                  The character development is real well in that you get a good feel for the characters, you bond with them through out the movie and you begin to care about there actions. Which is how these movies should work, now I have seen countless romantic comedies where the character development is shotty and they rely on big name actors to sell it while all the needed was better writing.....im looking at you “The Proposal”. It also makes me feel even more fuzzy when they focus more on the comedy than the romance. Im not saying that this movie is just comedy with a little bit of romance..the balance is there and it works perfectly....like pepperoni on pizza. And again that is because of the amazing chemistry of Mila and JT
                  Now Mila and JT didn’t just make the movie hilarious, Woody Harrelson and JT gay sports writer...holy S*** was he hilarious, the lines he was saying and constantly questioning JTs sexuality. The cameos from Andy Samberg and Emma Stone, Shaun White (who is still a goofy looking man) threatening JTs character for bumping into him, and of course the movie they keep referencing  through out...all of it created a complete package...like popcorn and sodie pop.
Awkward movie moment for me: JT boner pee...yep.....I said it.
Final Thought: JT and Mila Kunis once again prove why they are top Hollywood actors and actresses...and top comedic actors and actresses. The chemistry shared is uncanny, the lines delivered have perfect timing, and it is all around good romantic comedy. Raunchy at times but well played. So grab your friend or girl or guy, or whatever your fancy is...grab a box of candies, popcorn, soda, rubbers and see this movie
I give it 5 Cherry Cheese Danishs

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Captain America....America F*** YEAH


Tagline: Avenge
Starring: Chris Evans, Hayley Atwell, Sebastian Stan, Tommy Lee Jones, Hugo Weaving
Brief Synopsis: Scrawny boy Steve Rogers tries to join the army fight in WWII. Because of his small stature he can not join and is enlisted because of his good heart and determination to take a super soldier serum, that magically increases his height, strength, agility, and all around fantastical, he goes off to fight the villainous red skull…..in this story of his first adventure.
My Take: While I never read the Captain America comics but because im a fan of the marvel movies and also a comic geek I was excited for this movie to come out. I mean who doesn’t enjoy a classic Superhero movie. Epic battles, dramatic stories, feats of epic greatness….and its sad to say that this movie….lacks some of all it to some degree.
                As a comic book movie it holds well. I mean I know Captain America if you think about it isn’t really a Super hero……he doesn’t have any real powers. Not like the X-Men or Hulk, or any other marvel hero. Heck Iron Man is the Batman of Marvel. But any who I digress again. Back to Cap, so he is a average Joe who wants to join the army but cant because at the time the military had a you must be this tall to join mentality he couldn’t, so he takes a l super soldier serum (roids) and becomes the epic hero we know today. So what does that mean really…what does that say to the youth of America….it means instead of joining the gym and eating right just take a drug that helps you get big and strong.  Nice CAP NICE…im kidding its comics its make believe…but  seriously ROIDS!!! On a serious note the move had some good action sets most memorably the POW escape where they had a very nice shot of Cap and Red Skull on a bridge with fire all around them standing defiantly toward each other, creating a epic goose bump making shot of the Hero and the Nemesis stand off...rather poetic shot if I do say so myself.

                The story is lacking, it starts off with the poor guy mentality, scrawny guy and cant do what he really wants so we feel bad for him. He gets beat up and picked on but then he is givin a great gift. he meets a girl the rushed love story happens. a couple action scenes..what happened to him...oh there he is...ok little more rushed love story...final battle...tragic end...thats not the end. The issue I have is the fact that his development into Captain America was good, but it wasnt an epic story, as I said before I never followed the Cap comics BUT...I know that he also fought alongside Wolverine on a couple missions which would have been a real cool throw too. But the rest of teh sub stories seems rushed and barely touched. If you were gonna do a love story at least develope it more so when the tragic moment happens you feel something more.
                What made me laugh though was some of the dialogue, the script was written some well put doses of humor, it caught me off guard. Seeing Chris with the scrawny body at the beginning was also a comical thing to see…I feel like it was CGIed…perhaps it was..ill never tell. But it just made me laugh because we all know Chris is not built like that and his head at times seemed too big for his body. And I would like to give praise to Red Skull make up artist, he looks fantastic. Im not going to lie some of the best make up I have seen in a marvel movie next to mystique. Another note of entertainment value I want to mention is Caps “Acting” time in the movie to help propaganda and encourage the troops. Seeing Howard Stark was also a fun treat.
Where ‘s Stan: The one thing I enjoy about all the marvel movies is the Where’s Stan...where is Stan Lees brief 5 second cameo. ECSELSIORE!!!
Final Thought: As Marvel movies go, this is one not of the best BUT it is definitely worth seeing. The funny lines actions sequences and story make it a block buster delight. I recommend getting a D&D Cap Trimug Coolatta a Cap Donut, and get ready for this summers Marvel movie adventure.
I give this 4½ Shields

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Never Let Me Go...Yep this movie wont let you go


Tag Line: N/A
Cast: Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield, Keira Knightly
Plot: 3 Friends have to deal with their predetermined fates while discovering who they are and what they want.
My Take: Following the story of 3 kids lives from child hood into adult is often hard to do…because the movie tends to rush it….loosing storytelling and VERY important character development in order to put the whole thing into a two hour slide show. And sadly this movie has done the same thing. Not saying its bad and it stills conveys the same emotion and touch it was suppose to…I just wish they didn’t rush it.
              *SPOILERS ALOT OF THEM*The movie starts off in a seemingly nice boarding school where we meet the main characters Kathy, Tommy, and Ruth. Here is where we establish who loves who and starts the bases of the love story. They also learn about what they are meant to do. They receive tokens, which just like chucky cheese, can be cashed in for a seemingly useless and broken things. They have their classes and everything is normal. We fast forward 5 years They leave the school and move to a tiny little village…where they continue to live their short lives. We see them trying to deal with what the fact that yes….you will die in a 15 years. We fast forward 5 years. We learn that Kathy has become a caregiver, someone that cares for those giving their organs, Ruth has started donations and gives Tommy back to Kathy. We fast forward 5 years Kathy and Tommy have tried to get an extension because they love each other and find the dean of their old school to find it how to get one…where they learn a rather sad truth. Fast forward 5 years…the end.
Now I just summed up the movie I did disclosed some plot points but not in great detail. And the reason I said all that is to really establish the pacing of the movie. And this is really how it goes. It seems rather rushed doesn’t it. If they took an extra half hour to really establish each character well and tell a deeper story than the tragic end would linger more. And I don’t mean to deter people from seeing it…I believe any movie is worth seeing.
I do however believe they did a good job establishing the bond they have for one another and the love that bond created. And that through the heart felt dialogue that is delivered from to time. When one of these lines are delivered (just check out the quotes seen below) it tugs at the heart strings.
Memorable Quotes: Miss Lucy : None of you will go to America. None of you will work in supermarkets. None of you will do anything, except live the life that has already been set out for you. You will become adults, but only briefly. Before you are old, before you are even middle aged, you will start to donate your vital organs. And sometime around your third or fourth donation, your short life will be completed. You have to know who you are, and what you are. It's the only way to lead decent lives.

                                 Kathy: It had never occurred to me that our lives, so closely interwoven, could unravel with such speed. If I'd known, maybe I'd have kept tighter hold of them.
Unanswered Question: WTF were they…were they clones, test tube babies, or unwanted children?
Final Thought: Despite the rushed story. It was touching, moving, and slightly thought provoking. Dialogue delivered was moving and touching when needed.  I would grab a couple tissues, some wine, and cheese...and watch the journey of three friends as discover the value of their very short lives.
              I give it 3.5 out of 5 Cherry Cheese Danishes

The Rite...This isnt your mothers Exorcism...get over it


Tagline: You can only defeat it when you believe
Cast: Anthony Hopkins, Colin O’Donoghue, Alice Braga, Ciaran Hinda
Plot:  Michael Kovak travels to Italy to study exorcism all the while battling with his own beliefs and inner demons
My Take: Giving the amount of exorcism movies out there it’s not hard to compare one to another. This movie suffers the same scrutiny…and it shouldn’t. This movie takes a semi believable look at exorcisms. Now im not saying this movie has any credibility when it comes to topic because after all…it is Hollywood. But I don’t think its fare to compare this to the Exorcism and then bash it  like some people have…because if you want that movie…then watch it THAT movie.
                        But enough of those shenanigans…lets get to the movie. Its not as gritty a look at exorcisms as I had hoped for but it does a really good job of maintaining the creepiness that the topic brings...we can thank the actors for that. Each actor plays their part to the letter making every line believable. Sir Anthony Hopkins once again proves to us why he is a legendary actor playing the seen it all Father Lucas Trevant who has a strong faith and knows that the devil is real. Colin O’Donogue portrays the skeptic priest that no longer believes in God after the passing of his mother. However there were a couple scenes where you could have entered a priest and a child joke. The pacing of the movie was right on time…I didn’t find myself bored at all during the film. The mix of dialogue and action was very well proportioned.
 The conflict of faith; believing to non believing. If there is devil then there has to be a god is really well done between the arguments upheld by Kovak and Father Lucas. The freight is upheld by the occasional jump at you scares. By the real creepiness stems from the victims of possession and of course the final battle between good vs evil. I enjoyed not seeing silly contorted bodies you see in other “Hollywood possessions” and a lack of CGI. The make up effects of the possessed is really good. With the darkness around the eyes…I honestly felt like that is way it should look. Not the decaying skin and lacerations. However I did find it odd listening to devil speak gibberish instead of the generic curse words and swears. But then again I often felt the devil would be a slick man and not need to swear so much. And the final conflict lead up to my expectations…actually it went beyond what I was expecting I felt myself wishing I could fight the devil hand to hand.
Oddest things over
heard leaving the theater: “This movie has officially made me believe in god again”
                                           
                                           “I really need to start going back to church”

Random moment
that made me chuckle:  When Hopkins finally gets possessed and Smacks a little girl...really unexpected…and slightly comical

Final Thought: Giving the fact that it was a rated PG-13 like a lot of horror movies are (obviously because they can draw a larger crowd and make more money) it still maintained a really good story some creepy moments. The devil speaking in what seemed like nursery rhymes still seemed slightly odd BUT it is Anthony Hopkins speaking them which makes it creepy on its own…So by all means grab your holy water and crouton ‘o’ christs and see it theaters, on demand, or red box it when it comes either way this is one I wouldn’t recommend missing.  

                        I give it 4 out 5 cherry cheese Danishes

Saturday, January 15, 2011

3D Movies....to 3Do or 3Dont (Lame I know)


With todays technology it is no surprise that we are looking for the next thing to cash in on. And what better than to make movies 3D and 3D TVs….but is this move really necessary. Is now the time to make 3d movies?
A Very Brief History: 3D movies began being released in the 1950s…it was not a huge success giving the cost it needed to film the movies using the technology at the time...and in order to get the 3D effect you had to wear those beloved red and blue glasses. And the reason you needed those is because when the film was shot they filmed in 2 different perspectives or depths and needed to overlay the film…henceforth the need to use the red and blue to distinguish between which depth is what.
The 3D movies made a comeback in the 80s and 90s with the beginning of IMAX and Disney technologies (they rule the world). But they really took off in the new millennium and more specifically the past couple years.
Is it Necessary: With the current success of the 3D films it is no wonder why they are making EVERY movie in 3D and even releasing Blu-Rays in 3D format as well. But is the need to have 3D movies really needed. I can see making a movie in 3D if it was one that really utilized the effect of things coming at you and really gave you the perception of being there. And there have been a lot of movies made that don’t need to have the 3D effect and it seems like the movies are being filmed around the 3D effects. More specifically films like Resident Evil: Afterlife and Saw VII. Both films barely utilized the effect. The couple times RE:A was when the Axe Man thrown his axe which granted was cool but not jaw dropping and when Alice shot the quarters out of her sawed off. Especially when you saw the same thing in Saw VII but instead of an axe it was mechanical spear in a girls dream. Avatar used the 3D effect but it worked out real well because of the setting of the movie and how it was shot. It had environmental effects coming at you and the action sequences that were a good use of 3D but sadly movies like that are few and far between.
Spending that few extras dollars to see one or two things come at you does not seem warranted. Especially when after a while your eyes, like with everything else you stare at for 90-120 minutes, your eyes get adjust to. So essentially you have 10-25 minutes of wowness and 75 minutes of uncomfortable glasses. Its also a shame when they use the same effect in every movie…its 90 minutes of mediocre story and that one shot of something coming at your face. Now I know there are movies that use it more frquently but it doesn’t make the movie itself any better and that is the issue…they spend millions of dollars to make these movies in 3D in hopes to make an extra buck when all they really need to work on is the story itself. An example of Hollywood making a cash cow or in this case rereleasing a cash cow is Star Wars in 3D…all six of them starting in 2012…is it necessary not at all…but it will make HUGE bank.

What They Got Right: Hollywood is still making the good decision by releasing both a regular and 3D versions of movies, regular cheaper than the 3D of course. I feel if  they are to make 3d movies….make them in regards to world roller coasters…flying in a F-14…or something that would really utilize the 3D effects. Dont just film a movie in 3D, film a pie coming at your face, and expect us to buy into it. Its insulting to the movie goer. Until a movie is made that warrants the full use of 3D effects...don't make one.


**

A LIST OF UPCOMING 3D MOVIES (titles subject to be added ot removed)


2011

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017



**as seen on wikipedia

Sunday, January 2, 2011

True Grit.....How the west was AWESOME

Tagline: Punishment comes one way or another.
Starring: Jeff Bridges, Hailee Steinfeld, Matt Damon, Josh Brolin
Plot: Rooster Cogburn helps head strong Mattie Ross hunt for her daddy’s killer Tom Chaney in the remake of a John Wayne classic,
My Take: Only recently have I really gotten in to the old time westerns. The Good the Bad the Ugly, True Grit, Fist Full of Dollars all classics for their no hold bar anything goes look at the old west. The directorial style each one had was for the time so dramatic and made them really entertaining as you had the close up of the faces during the classic gunslinger duels, the close up of the twitchy fingers as they wait to draw the pistols, and let’s not forget the acting. Now the acting plays a big role in the old time westerns, just about anyone can replicate a horse back gun duel, or 2 men standing in the dirt covered road of the town with spectators running for the safety of their homes as high noon approaches. But sadly no one has really been able to really draw upon the acting that makes a really good western, well not since Tombstone.
                Being a huge a fan of the original (and no im not going to really compare the two and the reason is, its not fair to compare essentially someone else vision to another’s. And I think that’s why remakes get a bad rap because they do compare to them to the original….but ill save that for another time). But I will say this, the dialogue is almost identical to the original, the quips and intense dialogue still the same. There were some scenes added and taken out from the remake that honestly didn’t hinder the story or alter it….it made the story run smoothly. The story of Mattie Ross journey for revenge with Cogburn is well done the dialogue between the two flows so naturally a beat is never missed. The way the Coen brothers captured the action and the dramatic scenes make this movie really stand out amongst a lot of the recent westerns made.
                But what made this movie so…intense was the each actor portrayed every character. Lets start with Jeff Bridges as Rooster Cogburn, he played as a gritty, fearless man who loved his whiskey. His delivery in lines and stature as portrayed by Bridges will make you laugh but also make you feel the intensity and seriousness that is Rooster Cogburn. Next we have La Boeuf played by Matt Damon, The portrayal of La Boeuf was well-done in that he is Cogburn polar opposite. He is a Texas ranger and lives the honor of one often reciting ranger code, Damon plays him straight always clashing heads with Cogburn and ultimately coming to his aid and “proving himself.” Next we have Tom Chaney played by Josh Brolin. You don’t see much of Brolin till third quarter of the film. And you get the feeling he there is something off with him not necessarily evil but corrupt in some way. Brolyn played it nicely, he gave the character a dirty look of the killer on the run that would do anything to stay free and clear of the law, with the line deliver and swagger to boot…but you still liked him. Finally we come to the lady who stole the movie Mattie Ross, played by Hailee Steinfeld. She is a very head strong stubborn young woman, she is smart and knows how to play the game per say. She can talk herself into and out of just about anything. Her determination and will is very well portrayed and you cant but fall in love with her character.  She gives the movie the heart and the balance it needs to have.
Memorable Quotes: Mattie Ross:  I won't rest until Tom Chaney's barking in hell.  

 Mattie Ross:  Now I know you can drink whiskey and I saw you kill a rat, but all the rest has been talk. I'm not paying for talk. I can get all the talk I need at the Monarch Boarding House.
  Rooster Cogburn:  I ought to paddle your rump!
  Mattie Ross: I don't know how you propose to do that from that hog wallow you're sunk into. If I smelled as bad as you I wouldn't live near people.

Memorable Moments:  Tree branch hanger
                                      The cabin with the 2 criminals and one was injured
                                      The final horse duel
                                      The Snake bite rescue

Final Thought: As mentioned at the beginning I have not seen a western this intense with great writing and a camera work since Tombstone. And I haven’t been this enthralled in a movie since Dirty Harry . So Saddle up your horse cook up some beans, and ride yourself to the local movie saloon and be prepared for a journey only the Coen brothers and the Wild West can give you

                       I give it 5 Cherry Cheese Danish’s